The first one sounds rather unnatural to me.
Hi, native English speaker friends:
Which one is more frequently used and what's the difference?I wouldn't be having the time to do it.
I won't have the time to do it.
I think I hear the first one more often. But don't understand why people don't say the 2nd more often.
Many thanks
The first one sounds rather unnatural to me.
Context is important. Please provide enough for us to be able to deal effectively with your question.
Your thread title should include all or part of the word/phrase being discussed.
If you just want to know the meaning of a word, try OneLook Dictionary Search first.
As far as I'm concerned, the first is so unnatural as to be incorrect.
Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.
Thanks to you both, 5jj and emsr2d2.
But I think I've heard the pattern "I wouldn't be doing something" or "I would be doing something" very often. Is it just my illusion?
Plus, I think I've at least heard "I need to get going", rather than " I need to go"
I'm not disputing that. I'm simply saying that "I won't/wouldn't be having the time ..." is unnatural. Just because a construction is used with one set of words doesn't mean that you can use it with all of them.
If I were you, I wouldn't be doing that.
It's late so I need to get going.
I can't help you build your house tomorrow. I won't be having the time.
I can't help you build your house tomorrow. I won't have the time.![]()
Remember - correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing make posts much easier to read.
Thank you, Mr. emsr2d2.
But what's the difference between:
If I were you, I wouldn't be doing that.
If I were you, I would do that.
Context is important. Please provide enough for us to be able to deal effectively with your question.
Your thread title should include all or part of the word/phrase being discussed.
If you just want to know the meaning of a word, try OneLook Dictionary Search first.