2Likes -
1 Post By Calis -
1 Post By Raymott
-
If he hadn't shouted ... v Had he not shouted ...
And what if after all the bodies are carried out on stretchers, the man is still brought to trial for shouting fire in a crowded theater, and in his defense he points to the burnt ruins of the theater as proof that there really was a fire, only to be told that if he hadn't shouted, then there would have been no fire.
More:The Innocence of Obama | RSN Pick of the Day Right Side News
Had he not shouted, then there would have been no fire. Is it correct? I just want to learn how to use inversion to make it more formal.
-
Re: If he hadn't shouted ... v Had he not shouted ...
"Had he not shouted" is correct.
One can use this inversion to create conditional clauses with these verbs as well:
Should he do this, then that...
Were he to do this, then that...
Were he this, then that...
[Not a teacher]
-
Re: If he hadn't shouted ... v Had he not shouted ...
Hadn't he shouted, then there would have been no fire. Is it correct?
-
Re: If he hadn't shouted ... v Had he not shouted ...

Originally Posted by
Odessa Dawn
Hadn't he shouted, then there would have been no fire. Is it correct? No.
Similar Threads
-
By keannu in forum English Phrasal Verbs
Replies: 1
Last Post: 13-Feb-2011, 09:51
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1