|
#1
| |||
| |||
| My girlfriend was taught in university that there is an obvious difference, but Bartelby.com says this: "Dream has long had two sets of Standard past tense and past participle forms, dreamed and dreamt: She dreamed [dreamt] she won the lottery. I had dreamed [dreamt] that I was being pursued. Americans may slightly prefer dreamed and the British dreamt, but both occur frequently in American English. To dream a dream or to dream dreams is Standard and not considered redundant; you can also have dreams. Both verb and noun can combine with either of or about: He dreamed of [about] chocolate bars. She had a dream about [of] falling through space." Can anyone shed any light on this matter? :wink: |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| In my opinion, they (dreamed, dreamt) are just variant spellings. There may be stylistic reasons for choosing one over the other, but they mean the same thing. 8) |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| It's a bit like "heared" and "heard" then?
__________________ Red5 Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| I would consider "heared" nonstandard. 8) |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| 'spelled' and 'spelt'? 'learned' and 'learnt'? :D |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| I think it's just because the 't' is hard to distinguish from a regular ending. Earned\earnt |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
8) |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Apparently, the -t form was the one until it went to America and mets lots of migrants who couldn't really hear the difference and thought it was regular. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| dreamed, dreamt |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I've got another question..Sorry for the hassle ! | Helped Wanted | Ask a Teacher | 2 | 02-Nov-2003 13:10 |