#1  
Old 26-Nov-2004, 07:26
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default "have dove" versus "have dived"/"dived"

hi, there, it seems like i may be wrong about this after all, but i would like to know if the following are correct usages of the verb "dive" in the past tense ("dive" as in 'scuba dive').

i thought that the following was correct:

"i dove that cove before."

"i have dived that cove before."


i thought that the following was incorrect:

"i have dove that cove before."


according to my dictionary, "dove" is a past participle...but that last sentence above just doesn't sound right to me...HELP!!!!!

thank you in advance.

--s--
  #2  
Old 26-Nov-2004, 11:07
Casiopea's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,971
Member Type: Other
Default Re: "have dove" versus "have dived"/"dived"

The verb dive has two past tenses, dived and dove, and both are acceptable. Dived is actually the earlier form, and it's also the past participle.

Source: http://www.bartleby.com/64/C003/0104.html
  #3  
Old 22-Jan-2008, 23:06
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1
Member Type: English Teacher
Default Re: "have dove" versus "have dived"/"dived"

The article is correct, however the way you have interpreted it is incorrect.

The article does NOT say that dove is a Past Participle of the PRESENT PERFECT tense. What it says is that both dived and dove are ok in the SIMPLE PAST TENSE. Dived came later by analogy to other verbs that decline by vowel alternation.

In the present perfect, only HAVE DIVED is ok.

Here is why: English, like other germanic languages, has past participles ending in -n and -ed (compare to German -en and -t). For example, have begun, have run, have strung. Exceptions like "have come" came about due to loss of the -en suffix (compare to German "habe gekommen" which still has it).

To have a past participle formed through vowel alternation and ending in -ve is odd. It may catch on in time.

Supposedly, people say "have dove" by analogy to "drove". However, the correct form there, too, is "have DRIVED".
  #4  
Old 09-Feb-2009, 19:01
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3
Member Type: Student or Learner
Default Re: "have dove" versus "have dived"/"dived"

Actually, that would be "have driven", not "have drived". There is no such word as drived.
Also, "dived" preceded "dove". Dove is recent, and is not standard in British English.

Last edited by Phospheratu; 09-Feb-2009 at 19:06. Reason: Additional point
  #5  
Old 24-Mar-2010, 01:51
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
Member Type: English Teacher
Default Re: "have dove" versus "have dived"/"dived"

SOMENAME: It's not about Past Simple vs Present Perfect. It's the formula, which uses the PAST PARTICIPLE.
Simple past does not use the PP. Past Perfect and Present Perfect use the SAME PP.
Thus: I had driven, I have driven; I had dived, I have dived.

I really like the discussions about the origins of the vowel alternation. More than likely (perhaps attributable to German?) though, the shift is due to the "Sing, sang,sung" principle.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
quothave, dovequot, versus


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:03.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.