Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: nation-state

  1. #1
    fardamm is offline Newbie
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    3

    Default nation-state

    Hello
    I appreciate any suggestion (grammar etc) in relation to my article.
    (This a translation from Farsi to English).(the proper nouns are replaced with X).
    Regards
    ======
    "This paper is seeking to analyze a theory which has been introduced by one of the X-ian intellectuals regarding the analysis of politics and reforms in X .
    “ X”, having put forward the theory of “ Nation-State Rebuilding”(1), during the recent years, has struggled to analyze the X-ian reformist movement in contemporary history, and prescribe a practical model for reforms in X .
    The author of this article, reviewing this theory, proceeds with a discussion and critique of the initial foundations of this theory, then revealing its incorrect claims ; also reflecting on the vane of Nation-States and emergence of a phenomenon naming Globalization( as an option and ideal), describes the logical but harmfulness consequences and outcomes of emphasizing on the Nation-State project , and hazardous orientations of suggesting such a theory in present age .
    Orientation

    X once had said that “X, leaving the gap in analysis of politics, led to flowering of Lenin’s Theories, and ultimately we faced X–X . Now we want to see whether X’s theory, “ Nation-State Rebuilding”, practically prone to make the ground for flowering of X, and impose the experiences like Marxism-Leninism .
    The importance of present analysis lies in the fact that during the this century many of the X-ian reformist’s failures and frustrations have been resulted from our intellectuals’ misunderstanding of the existing conditions , reforming movement, and consequently some recommendations that they have proposed.

    It is good enough to take a look at the X-ian intellectuals’ prescription at a critical time when X was taking the reins of power, they were banging the drum for nationalism so heavily that uncared for freedom; or prescription of X-ian intellectuals in X revolution , which practically directed them to follow X clergy, the left or religious ideological ‘savor–of- mankind‘ theories ."

  2. #2
    Gillnetter is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,165
    Teacher

    Default Re: nation-state

    Quote Originally Posted by fardamm View Post
    Hello
    I appreciate any suggestion (grammar etc) in relation to my article.
    (This a translation from Farsi to English).(the proper nouns are replaced with X).
    Regards
    ======
    "This paper is seeking to analyze a theory which has been introduced by one of the X-ian intellectuals regarding the analysis of politics and reforms in X .

    “ X”, having put forward the theory of “ Nation-State Rebuilding”(1), during the recent years, has struggled to analyze the X-ian reformist movement in contemporary history, and prescribe a practical model for reforms in X .

    The author of this article, reviewing this theory, proceeds with a discussion and critique of the initial foundations of this theory, then revealing revels its incorrect claims; also reflecting on the vane{?} of Nation-States and emergence of a phenomenon naming Globalization( as an option and ideal), describes the logical but harmfulness harmful consequences and outcomes of emphasizing on the Nation-State project, and hazardous orientations of suggesting such a theory in the present age .

    Orientation

    X once had said that “X, leaving the gap in analysis of politics, led to the flowering of Lenin’s theories, and ultimately we faced X–X . Now we want to see whether X’s theory, “ Nation-State Rebuilding”, is practically prone to make the ground for the flowering of X, and impose the experiences like Marxism-Leninism.

    The importance of the present analysis lies in the fact that during the this century many of the X-ian reformist’s failures and frustrations have been resulted from our intellectuals’ misunderstanding of the existing conditions, reforming movements, and consequently, some recommendations that they have proposed.

    It is good enough to take a look at the X-ian intellectuals’ prescription at a critical time when X was taking the reins of power. They were banging the drum for nationalism so heavily that uncared {Unsure of your meaning here} for freedom; or prescription of X-ian intellectuals in X revolution, which practically directed them to follow X clergy, the left or religious ideological ‘savor–of- mankind‘ theories ."
    This text would be clearer if you used shorter sentences. A space is not required after punctuation. A space is required between paragraphs. I suggest that you rewrite this and post it again.

Similar Threads

  1. Why is forget often listed as a state verb?
    By echelon in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 28-Sep-2009, 21:23
  2. is or are? and State of state
    By crussell in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-Aug-2007, 03:41
  3. Secretary of State
    By Piak in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-Feb-2007, 15:50
  4. capitalization the state or the State?
    By bosun in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 18-Sep-2006, 06:55
  5. Difficult expressions
    By Piak in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-Mar-2003, 20:21

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0