About three sentenses, pls explain and correct

correct the three sentenses, pls!
1. Deep weighing all the assumption and premises on closer analysis, we can find that neither are the premises convincing nor is the conclusion compelling.

2. Had the arguer taken the following discussed factors into view, it would render the argument irrefulatable. (1) (2) (3)

3. Who could explain this sentense?
It is the result of a great deal of speculation in which the arguer comfortably assumed a considrable amount of data.

upupup

1)neither the premises convincing nor the conclusion compelling.
2)Has the debater taken the...
3)Who could...sentence?
...which the debater...considerable...

[quote=creative;112103]correct the three sentenses, pls!
1. Deeply weighing all the assumptions and closely analysing the premises , we can find that neither the premises convincing nor the conclusion compelling.

2. Had the arguer taken the following discussed factors into account, it would have rendered the argument irrefulatable. (1) (2) (3)

3. Who could explain this sentence?
It is the result of a great deal of speculation in which the arguer comfortably assumed a considerable amount of data.


regards'

1. Deeply weighing all the assumption and closely analysing premises, we can find neither the premises convincing nor the conclusion compelling.

2. Had the arguer taken the following discussed factors into view, it would have rendered the argument irrefulatable. (1) (2) (3)

3. Who could explain this sentense?
It is the result of a great deal of speculation in which the arguer comfortably assumed a considerable amount of data.


regards'

Is there such a word as 'arguer'?