Teaching strategies

[Johnny]

Here next is part of what I've just written, could you guys help me check them out and let me know what should be revised to make it better to understand. And please let me know if there are any grammatical mistakes.

1. Training the learners learning strategies.
Teaching strategies are not (), but interactive with learning strategies because they should have ultimate effects. So it’s a question to have teaching or learning considered when plotting the network-based English teaching strategies. The researchers have different perspectives because of different angles. However, I tend to put the focus on considering how the learners study, meaning how could make the teaching strategies be carried out among the learners much better. It’s better to put teaching strategies into practice and reduce the phenomenon that network-based learning is inefficient to a certain extent, if the learners could receive the training on learning strategies.

The following parts of learning strategies should be prioritized in the process of designing teaching strategies. Like setting up the target, establishing the plans, selection of strategies, self-control, self-estimate, and self-regulation. Hjenglish.com has made some attempts in this aspect. Firstly, there’s a specific target in the program introduction. Secondly, this website would not only help the learners set up the learning plans, but also carry through the teaching as planned. Then, the moderators (role as teachers) would elaborate on what to do, how to do, when to do and why. Offering the learners comparatively optimized learning strategies. In the end, the learners would be required to complete self-control and self-estimate by keeping log of learning everyday. However, it’s necessary to train the learners on the strategies of self-regulation (Hjenglish.com has not accomplished this point). And it will be hard to meet the goal if they could not be helped to do self-adjustment. Or it’s likely to get derailed from the target, perhaps the strong would get much stronger and weaker be much weaker.

[RonBee]

Originally Posted by Johnny

let me know what should be revised to make it easier to understand.

[Johnny]

Ohh, alright! Thank you!

[RonBee]

Originally Posted by Johnny

Teaching strategies are not (), but interactive with learning strategies because they should have ultimate effects.

In plain English, what does that sentence mean?

[Johnny]

Originally Posted by RonBee

In plain English, what does that sentence mean?

I was looking for a good word to fill in the brackets, some friends suggested single-way/one-way.

The whole sentence means that teaching strategies and learning strategies are complementary and interactive. At the same time, teaching strategies have their goals or effects.

[Tdol]

Training the learners learning strategies.
I'd use learners in

[RonBee]

Originally Posted by Johnny

Hjenglish.com has made some attempts in this aspect.

Perhaps:

Hjenglish.com has made some attempts in this area.

Originally Posted by Johnny

Then, the moderators (role as teachers) would elaborate on what to do, how to do, when to do and why.

Then the moderators would elaboate on what to do, how to do it, when to do it, and why it should be done.

Originally Posted by Johnny

Or it’s likely to get derailed from the target, perhaps the strong would get much stronger and weaker be much weaker.

Or the program will fail because the strong will get stronger and the weak will get weaker.

For the most part I have no suggestions as I don't understand it. (I suggest that you unlearn prioritize and optimize.)