Hello,
I am putting the finishing touches on my personal statement for law school and want to make sure everything is correct grammatically. I have several sentences where I am torn between the use of two words for a variety of reasons (i.e. based on present vs past tense) and I am not sure which is the most appropriate in the context of the sentence.
I have put the 2 competing words in bold-red with a separating forward slash. The highlighted yellow word is what I am currently using. PLEASE advise on which ones are correct. Thanks!:
1. Through a balanced diet of theorists such as Locke, Holmes, and Tocqueville I discovered abstract political and legal concepts, while Keynes, Smith, and Sharpe shaped my understanding of financial theory. A /The pursuit of edification had grown to be fundamental to my personality.
2. So as I left the doctor’s office still processing my diagnosis, its potential consequences including stroke and paralysis, I couldn’t help but walk straight to the library, to/and begin outlining my options.
3. While these ‘workarounds’ were effective, overtime I became increasingly concerned that they might also be/have been avoidable. (Also do I need quotes around workarounds?)
4.During the summer prior to my junior year I decided to pour all my efforts into investigating surgical options that could conceivably/possibly cure me.
5. As my doctors celebrated my physical renaissance, I redirected my time and energy toward both/ (no both) academic achievement and contemplating a career in the law.
My choices
1 The (I must say that I found this sentence a bit flowery for my taste)
2 Either, but I'd remove the comma.
3 I would use have been, but don't object to be.
I used OneLook, which searches hundreds of online dictionaries and it doesn't appear in many, so maybe keep the inverted commas:
Definitions of workaround - OneLook Dictionary Search
Compare with work and see how many dictionaries have that- most of the big names are missing in the first search
Definitions of work - OneLook Dictionary Search
4 Hard to say- conceivably is stronger, so it depends on how far you went. As it's law school, I might stick to the more conservative possibly.
5 Both might suggest a greater focus on these exclusively
Good luck with your application.![]()
Thanks a ton! I agree with you about number 1. I actually changed it up after that post.
Again, I appreciate it!
In your example, "over time" is two words.
I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.
In sentence 4, with conceivably/possibly, something which may be conceived may not necessarily be possible at that point in time. Conceivably still "sounds" better than possibly though...it just all depends on how literal you want to be.
Sentence 5 is a choice of style. Tdol brings up a point that suggests greater exclusivity. but it doesn't really add new information. Brevity is a virtue though and since the meaning would be preserved if both was removed from the sentence, I would personally omit it.