Non-native speaker outnumber native speakers, but they are not speaking the same thing, so I don't think it could be lumped together as a single variant. However, the influence and impact that non-native speakers have on the language will increase in the world we have today. There is no table where people sit and decide on the future of English, and English is not the exclusive property of native speakers.
Harold Wilson, the Labour politician, retained the Yorkshire accent he probably felt was more in keeping with the socialist party he led. Edward Heath and Margaret Thatcher, however, Conservative party leaders, strove to emulate the accent of the upper classes.
Context is always important; labelling is rarely important.
On that note, as I was listening today to David Cameron's speech delivered in Davos it dawned on me how (to my foreign ear) the English he uses is free from any "accent". I believe his speeches could be used (unabridged) in English classes as a teaching aid. And I think this goes further than just the lack of an accent. For instance he used this phrase (free from any idiom): "year after year" where perhaps it would have been more automatic for an English native speaker to say: "year in year out" which (idiomatic) expression some ESL speakers might not have understood. Even if this last example is found by native speakers groundless, I will still hold that the current British PM deliberately styles his language to be more readily undestood by ESL speakers. This also serves to support his self alleged non-insular views
![]()
Last edited by JarekSteliga; 27-Jan-2012 at 06:38.