I agree that skiing is a verb in those sentences.Originally Posted by MikeNewYork
:wink:
Progressive infinitives and perfect infinitives are OK with me.Originally Posted by tdol
It is better to have loved and lost...
I am to be seeing my doctor at four.
What else would one call "to have loved" and "to be seeing"?
I'm not sure about phrasal infinitive, but I couldn't come up with a better term for "To go + present participle".
There's also the perfect progressive infinitive.![]()
Hmmm. Do you have an example? :?Originally Posted by tdol
I'd to have been doing...
Or is that BE?
No, that's AE as well. It works for me. :wink:Originally Posted by tdol
So that's what 'doing' is doing there. Thanks Mike. :DOriginally Posted by MikeNewYork
:D I also found this. :D The italics are mine.
When “To be” verbs are combined with modal forms in this manner, the construction is called a phrasal modal. Here are some more examples:
Rosario was able to finish her degree by taking online courses.
She wasn't supposed to graduate until next year.
She will be allowed to participate in commencement, though.
She is about to apply to several graduate programs.
She is going to attend the state university next fall.
Sometimes it is difficult to say whether a “To be” verb is linking a subject to a participle or if the verb and participle are part of a passive construction.
In “Certain behaviors are allowed,” is "are” linking “behaviors” to "allowed" (a participle acting as a predicate adjective) or is “are allowed” a passive verb? In the final analysis, it probably doesn't matter, but the distinction leads to some interesting variations. Consider the difference between
The jurists were welcomed.
The jurists were welcome.
In the first sentence, the participle “welcomed” (in this passive construction) emphasizes the action of welcoming: the smiles, the hearty greetings, the slaps on the back. In the second sentence, the predicate adjective “welcome” describes the feeling that the jurists must have had upon being so welcomed.
http://webster.commnet.edu/grammar/to_be.htm
There's was also a paper written in 1995, the author of which, M- something--sorry I can't seem to pull it from my brain at the mo'--argues that 'supposed to be' functions as an adjectival phrase.
:D
I can see a case for the adjectival phrase.![]()