
04-Dec-2003, 17:07
|
| |
Re: Are the 5 basic sentence patterns sacred? Quote: |
Originally Posted by Casiopea Quote: |
Originally Posted by jwschang
I think that we can look at it as a shortened adjective phrase with both the heading preposition "in" and (say) the noun "condition" abandoned, leaving only the modifier "brand new" from the adjective phrase "in a brand-new condition". As an adjective phrase, it's position is not abnormal, in "I sold him my car in a brand new condition". So, SVC? :wink: | That's an interesting analysis.
It'd be S VC is V were a linking verb et al, like this:
My car is brand new. (SV C)
Let's look at an SVOC structure:
They named (V) the baby(O) George (C). (SVO C)
'named' takes an object and that object requires a complement. In fact, if we switch the order of the object and the complement the result is ungrammatical:
*They named (V) George (C) the baby (O).
In short, with SVOC structures the O and the C cannot be switched. On the other hand, with SVOO structures the DO and the IO can be switched:
I sold (V) him (IO) the car (DO) brand new. (SVOO+ Adjunct)
I sold (V) it (DO) to him (IO) brand new. (SVOO+ Adjunct)
Note, 'brand new' is added information; information not required by the verb to express its basic meaning. The same holds true for 'in a brand new condition', as well as other information that's not stated inside the verb's subcategorization frame:
sold [something, to someone]; [someone, something]
:D | You're right. So, it's SVO, with the "brand-new" as a modifier of O. |