Prescriptivists believe that language is governed by rules and they know what they are.
Descriptivists believe that what people say is correct, so do not try to judge what is right and wrong- if something is used, then it is correct.![]()
What are the arguments that prescriptive and descriptive linguistists use to justify their positions?
Prescriptivists believe that language is governed by rules and they know what they are.
Descriptivists believe that what people say is correct, so do not try to judge what is right and wrong- if something is used, then it is correct.![]()
How can a descriptivist ESL teacher teach that one thing is better than another? If a student wants to learn what the rules are, what does he tell that student--that there are no rules?
:wink:
As we know, some do.Originally Posted by RonBee
![]()
Red5
Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com
In any case, if you want to speak English you must use English grammar. In practice, no descriptivist will give his okay to just anything. For example, I daresay that nobody would say that "Me rode the bus" is correct English.Originally Posted by Red5
A descriptivist would accept that more than one form might be right. An example is the use of 'If I was', which was regarded by prescriptivists as wrong, despite the fact that the majority of native speakers use it. Descriptivists would say that both forms are used, so they are both correct.![]()
How is "If I was," wrong? Couldn't you say "If I was at the movie theater, obviously I saw a movie." Wouldn't that be correct?
It isn't.Originally Posted by Will
But you could go to a movie theater without seeing a movie,Originally Posted by Will
:wink:
Then why did tdol say 'If I was' was regarded as wrong by prescriptivists.
P.S.: In all likelyhood, if you went to the movie theater, you saw a movie.
But I don't agree with them. :wink:Originally Posted by Will
True.Originally Posted by Will
:wink: