
Originally Posted by
5jj
I am afraid it's not a very helpful feeling.
That is not the case in English
Of course, they are useless for native speakers.
But I think it's helpful, at least for Chinese speakers to know that the length is more important than the pitch.
I understood patran's problem immediately because I had the same problem.

Originally Posted by
5jj
In a completely unstressed syllable, many vowels emerge as /ə/, but most vowels retain their quality when there is secondary stress.
Yes. But a secondary stress is also a stress.
Well, I admit that my diction is not good. If fact, there are many cases where the vowels are not stressed but retain full. You may give better counterexamples.
According to dictionary.com, the unstressed prefix a is usually a /ə/,
e.g. adjoin adject, assent, about...
But if the a is followed by consonants like /p//t//k/, it is usually a /ć/.
e.g. advance, advice, accede...
If a word has two syllables, and the second syllable has a consonant ending, it's usually non-reduced. But If the ending is /r/ or /n/, it's usually reduced.

Originally Posted by
5jj
Can you give some examples of this?.
It's not a absolute rule, either. Examples:
'record vs. re'cord
disreputable vs disrepute
compete vs. competent
comedy vs. comedian
# EDIT
It seems that I've said too much off-topic things.
I'm not advocating “Pitch hasn't nothing to do with stess.”, “Length is the only feature of stress” or “Unstressed syllables don't contain full vowels”.