Quote:
|
Originally Posted by j4mes_bond25 I thought such an additional "t" was only a part of British English. But it seems the same goes for North American accent, as well then ??? |
Not to my knowledge, but North America is a big place! There are a great many dialects to go through.
As for me, I don't insert [t] in the words in our list.

The one exception "in[t]stant" has to do with syllable weight. [t] is inserted syllable finally, after <n> to balance the weight of articulatory movements across the syllable boundary:
in_stant => in[t]_ stant
The onset <st> is heavy, whereas the coda <n> was too light.
Quote:
|
By the way, does this "t" in between "n" and "s" sound a part of RP accent or is it seen as a part of "posh" English ???
|
I'm not 100% sure, but the source we're working from is Cambridge, so I suspect [t] is a phonetic characteristic of Standard British English, RP. Check with tdol, teh site editor here at UsingEnglish.com. Private Message him. He'll know.
Quote:
|
Lastly, speaking of "posh" English, RP and Plummy are seen as "posh" in Britain. What is the equivalent there in North America?
|
Well, to my knowledge, RP finds its origins in the class-system, which is something we don't really have in North America (Psst. Our ancestors left all that behind). As for a North American term that's synonymous with "posh", I am not sure there is one. Phrases such as "speaks well", "well educated", "sounds British", "highfalutin" (grand or self-important in a pretentious way), "pretentious" come to mind.
