|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I notice no or almost no difference between the pronunciation of these words. Are they really pronounced the same way? Thanks. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Hi Stuart! I personally prefer to pronounce "accept" with a very distinctive "a", like the "a" of "America". Do you think it is a problem? Thanks. |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Not a problem at all. I often make the difference audibly clear if I think there is any possibility of confusion or uncertainty. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| At least in theory the <a> in “accept” is pronounced as the unaccented schwa /c/ (a central vowel) while the first <e> in “except” is pronounced as the short /w/ (a mid high front vowel). |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| I have an Oxford dictionary with very useful pronunciation symbols (IPA) written behind the words. I looked up both words and this is what this dictionary tells me: Except: /ɪkˈsept/ Accept: /əkˈsept/ Note that even the stress on the syllables are exactly the same. The only difference is that accept starts with a schwa, and that except starts with a /ɪ/ like in <sit>. So there is a difference, but indeed quite hard to tell when the language is spoken in its normal speed. PS: The symbols are written in recieved pronunciation accent. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| (not a professional teacher) In common usage in American English, they sound (to my ear) exactly the same. Listen to it on Dictionary.com or SpellingCity.com. Sounds the same to me..... |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |