How many times have I said that to inexperienced teachers?
I have shocked some teachers I have observed by saying that there is no
law that prescribes an ice-breaker/warmer at the start of a lesson and closer at the end. A good lesson does not have to follow a P-P-P (or E-S-A or whatever) pattern. I do get annoyed with trainers and observers who seem to believe that what is recommended on a
CELTA/Trinity course is the only way to teach.
What trainees learn on such courses is methods and techniques that have been shown to be (usually) successful and effective. That does not mean that they are the only ways. What is often forgotten is that both Cambridge and Trinity stress that their certificates are
initial qualifications. What has been learnt on such courses enables somebody with no previous experience to have a fair chance of surviving their first appointment without doing too much harm to their students or themselves.
If teachers have established a good rapport with their students, their is no absolute need for a 'warmer' as such. Why should one need to 'warm' an already warm relationship?
I must stress that I am
not suggesting that newly-qualified teachers reject everything they have learnt on their initial training course. No. Much of what they learnt will be valuable ten years later. What I am suggesting is that the helpful guidelines they learnt should be treated as such, not as rigid laws.
So, moonlike, don't agonise about having to find an appropriate ice-breaker. Think about how you are going to introduce the topic you want your students to cope with.