|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Although "so" is redundant, is this sentence grammatically correct because so can be an adverb? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Hi, Betterin, Your sentence will be OK if you leave out either because or so. Rgs |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Is this sentence grammatically correct if both "because" and "so" are used? |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I don't think so. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| I think that it is at least grammatically correct if both "because" and "so" are used, although "so" is redundant. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| No, definitely not. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| I think it is OK,because "so" can be considered as an adverb. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| An inversion would clear things up: "We had better leave early, because it is going to rain." With this, it's easy to see how 'so' is redundant in either structure. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| In what sense? What's it modifying? |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| All so is doing is "coordinatingly joining" the clauses, and there you are. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |