|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
![]() <a href="http://www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/open_source_teaching.pdf">http://www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/ research/open_source_teaching.pdf</a></p> Likely you will have already seen reference to this paper in today's OLDaily, but I felt it was worth reposting as it is a good paper and early on makes an important distinction that I think is too often left dormant in LOR projects and leads to no end of confusion about what people are trying to achieve. </p> This distinction has to do with the drivers behind the use of learning objects/repositories. The paper outlines 4:</p> - The efficiency route: the argument that learning objects and repositories enable scaleable reuse of materials and are thus a more efficient way to develop materials - The teacher-centred route: sharing LOs will enable cross the board improvement of teaching materials - The pupil-centred route: LOs, in that they also promote the separation of content and presentation and can be traversed to present new versions, enable accessibility and learning-style-centric versions of online materials - The freedom argument: the LO approach allows instructors to take control of the means of production and share the intellectual product widely</p> more...</p> Read more... Source: EdTechPost Technologies for Learning, Thinking & Collaborating
__________________ Red5 Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
|
__________________ Red5 Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| becta, paper, open, source, teaching, kaleidoscope |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |