| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I am trying to teach my 3 Chinese students to perform grammatical analysis on English sentences (or what some people call "diagramming a sentence"). I am nothing close to a qualified English teacher; I only come from a heavily French Canadian education background. Back in high school, I was taught to perform grammatical analysis for the French language, but never for the English language. Of course, since both languages originate from Western Europe, I was curious whether I could apply the same analysis on English sentences as I would on French sentences; so a few years ago I asked my English teacher in pre-university college about this matter. She said that, indeed, the structure of English sentences is similar enough to that of French sentences that I can pretty much apply the same analysis, with minor differences - e.g. we don't have gerunds in French, AFAIK. She also said that although the vocabulary for French grammatical analysis may not be "official" when applied in the context of English, the majority of it definitely would not be "wrong" as far as the meaning and result are concerned. That English teacher is from England, so I trust her. Now, given that I can apply mostly the same grammatical analysis in English as in French, the English sentence would then be composed of one or more clauses. The core of each clause is, naturally, the conjugated verb (i.e. the predicate), just like in French. So now my first challenge is teaching my students to identify conjugated verbs (i.e. the predicate), as opposed to infinitives, participles, gerunds, and maybe more forms that I'm missing. I realise that it is trickier to identify predicates in English than in French because French conjugated verbs don't look anything like their infinitive or participial forms, be it regular or irregular verbs; whereas in English, this is not the case. For instance, in English, the indicative present tense first person singular usually looks the same as the infinitive, save for the lack of "to." Another example is irregular verbs like "to put": the past participle is spelled exactly the same as the infinitive (and the indicative present tense first person singular). To help solve the problem, here are a few rules or guidelines that I have come up with:
|
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Hi SwordAngel Your explanations, while fine, seem somewhat rather complicated. Here's a quicker way. How to find an action verb in a sentence: Process for finding the verb or verb phrase in a sentence: If "yes," double-underline the word and label it "A" for action verb. Now skip to the sixth part of the process. If "no," look for a linking verb. ______________________________ See also, The Verb What is a verb? (Linguistics) Verbs What Is a Verb? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Regarding the actual diagramming of a sentence, these pages will help you. This page is an index of how to diagram pretty much anything: Diagramming Sentences Index This page has example sentences that you or your students could use: The English Grammar Exercise Page :) Elizabeth |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are the 5 basic sentence patterns sacred? | infinikyte | General Language Discussions | 49 | 28-Aug-2009 21:52 |
| intransitive & nontransitive verbs | 1364 | Ask a Teacher | 10 | 10-Oct-2005 02:27 |
| sentence analysis of phrasal verbs | hela | English Phrasal Verbs | 7 | 08-Oct-2005 20:43 |
| Attributive Clause - China Needs Your Help | ChinaDavid | Ask a Teacher | 5 | 09-Jan-2005 15:56 |
| transitive verbs, predicates, and absolute phrases | mas94010 | Ask a Teacher | 1 | 04-Apr-2003 20:59 |