[Grammar] Deviate From Script

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 17, 2015
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
United States
This dictionary has the following definition for the verb "deviate":


"to start doing something different from what is expected or agreed"


, with an example usage:


"Try not to deviate too much from the script."


A "script" is the printed text that an actor say in a show or movie, not directions for what to do. The definition of "deviate" requires that it be followed by some action, not some prepared text (script). So, would the following rewrite:


"Try not to deviate too much from saying the script."


be better?
 
No, the original is better. "Deviate from the script" means that the conversation becomes different from the written text (script). It is understood that the script is translated to spoken conversation. 'Saying' doesn't work, probably 'following'.
 
No, because in addition to the written words the actor is supposed to say, a script will also include some general instructions about how to say the words, emotional state, movement instructions,and more. All kinds of instructions that help set the scene.

So, an actor might still be saying the correct words, but saying them in the wrong manner (happily instead of angrily), or doing the wrong thing (sitting when he's supposed to be walking), looking in the wrong direction, etc.
 
But, if "script" is replaced with "prepared text", would this:


"Try not to deviate too much from saying the prepared text."


be better than this:


"Try not to deviate too much from the prepared text."

?
 
It is more than just saying or reading the text in acting. A whole range of expressions are involved as Skrej mentioned.
 
@tedmc

But, "prepared text" removes all the acting stuff.
 
But, if "script" is replaced with "prepared text", would this:


"Try not to deviate too much from saying the prepared text."


be better than this:


"Try not to deviate too much from the prepared text."

?

No, you would still say "try not to deviate too much from the prepared text".

Edit:
Similarly, you'd say:
"don't deviate from the schedule"
"don't deviate from the menu"
"don't deviate from the itinerary"
"don't deviate from the route"

Notice how none of those examples have extra verbs in them, i.e. it's not "don't deviate from driving the route" or "don't deviate from serving the menu", etc.
 
Last edited:
saying the prepared text.
I would use 'speaking' instead of 'saying', but I am not a teacher.

"to start doing something different from what is expected or agreed"...
The definition of "deviate" requires that it be followed by some action, not some prepared text (script).
The definition requires that 'from' be followed by 'what is expected or agreed', which applies to the prepared text (script), i.e. the text is expected to be spoken (the script is expected to be followed).
 
Last edited:
"Speaking" the prepared text does not work either. I agree with Skrej that the gerund is not required as what you do with the text is understood,
 
Because speak is an intransitive verb.
 
A question for the teachers -

Can you say "speaking the prepared text"?
 
A question for the teachers -

Can you say "speaking the prepared text"?
It is not incorrect, although I would prefer "reading the prepared text."
 
How about:

"Try not to deviate too much from the prepared text."

versus:

"Try not to deviate too much from speaking from the prepared text."

Is the latter better than former because the nature of the deviation is explained more clearly by "speaking from the prepared text" than just "the prepared text"?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top