[Grammar] have got to

Status
Not open for further replies.

shibli.aftab

Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Hindi
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
What are the differences in meaning of below written sentences?

1. You have to work.
2. You have got to work.
3. You have gotta work.
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
What are the differences in meaning of below written sentences?

1. You have to work.
2. You have got to work.
3. You have gotta work.

They all have the same basic meaning. If there is any difference between 1 and 2, "got" can be used for emphasis. "Gotta" is used but it is not standard English.
 

shibli.aftab

Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Hindi
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
They all have the same basic meaning. If there is any difference between 1 and 2, "got" can be used for emphasis. "Gotta" is used but it is not standard English.

But, I think "have to" already emphasize the sentence, then why extra "get"?

Thanks
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
But, I think "have to" already emphasize the sentence, then why extra "get"?

Thanks

I agree with bhai that the "got" is unnecessary. But it can be added for emphasis. You have GOT to work. For me, that can be more emphatic than even: You HAVE to work.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
But, I think "have to" already emphasize the sentence, then why extra "get"?

Quite simply, why not? There is no rule that only necessary words must be used. Both forms exist, just as we use have/have got for possession.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top