I have sent you an invite link for the meeting

[waliu]

I have sent you an invite link for the meeting or I have sent you an invitation link for the meeting?

I have not seen your invite for the meeting or I have not seen your invitation for the meeting?

 

[Tarheel]

I am not sure what an "invite link" is, but I think it's okay.

Isn't the email enough of an invitation?

 

[emsr2d2]

Are the following sentences grammatically correct?
1. I have sent you an invite link for the meeting. or
2. I have sent you an invitation link for the meeting.
3. I have not seen your invite for the meeting. or
4. I have not seen your invitation for the meeting?

Please note my improved layout for your post. You failed to actually ask us a question or make a request in post #1. You must make it clear what you would like us to do. Whenever you give us more than one sentence to consider, number them.

I don't find any of them natural. For 1 and 2, I'd say "I've sent you a link to [join] the meeting" or "I've sent you an invitation to the meeting. The link is in my email". For 3 and 4, I'd say "I don't think I've received the link to the meeting".

I assume you're talking about an online meeting, such as on Zoom, where you need to send the link to all the participants in advance. Am I right?

 

[Tarheel]

If the message is in an email it would make sense to send the link in the email. That way you know they've got it.

 

[emsr2d2]

If the message is in an email it would make sense to send the link in the email. That way you know they've got it.

Only if that works. For over a year during you-know-what, our choir had to rehearse over Zoom. Two of our members were unable to join a meeting if someone included the link in a personal email. They could only get in if someone sent the link direct from the Zoom website.