Irony vs Coincidence

Status
Not open for further replies.

Checkmate

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Malay
Home Country
Malaysia
Current Location
Malaysia
"a firetruck caught in fire".

People say this is ironic but where is the irony? I think it's a coincidence because firetruck is meant to deal with fire.
 
A firetruck is intended to put out fire but it is actually on fire, so it is ironic.

Not a teacher.
 
We say "caught fire" or "caught on fire".
 
I am not a teacher.

It would be a coincidence if two fire engines caught fire at the same time.
 
I would not call that an irony. A fire truck (or fire brigade that I am more used to calling) risks catching fire just like any other vehicle.
The purpose for which it is intended does not make it less vulnerable to catching a fire.

not a teacher
 
I think a fireman is much more vulnerable than a firetruck, which does not enter the fire scene ── that's what I saw in 'Chicago fire'.

Not a teacher.
 
Last edited:
I would not call that an irony. A fire truck (or fire brigade that I am more used to calling) risks catching fire just like any other vehicle.
The purpose for which it is intended does not make it less vulnerable to catching a fire.

not a teacher

Um, no. If your firetrucks are routinely catching on fire, then you're doing something wrong. It is indeed ironic that a vehicle intended to fight fire is in need of rescue from a fire.
 
I would not call that an irony. A fire truck (or fire brigade that I am more used to calling) risks catching fire just like any other vehicle.
The purpose for which it is intended does not make it less vulnerable to catching a fire.

not a teacher
In BrE, the term "fire brigade" has always referred to the firemen (now increasingly known as "firefighters") and their organisation, rather than their vehicles, in the same way as the word "Army" refers to both the soldiers and the totality of their units. The Fire Brigade's vehicles are called fire tenders, or fire trucks. Interestingly, in these PC days when everything has to be a "service", fire brigades are now called "fire and rescue services", and we now have police "services" instead of "forces".
 
I think if a man gets hit by an ambulance, it will be ironic too. Is this right?
 
'An ambulanceman hit by an ambulance' may be ironic.

Not a teacher.
 
I think if a man gets hit by an ambulance, it will be ironic too. Is this right?

I am not a teacher.

Yes, it would be ironic.

I remember a case in London many years ago of an ambulance driver being guilty of a hit-and-run. Now, that's bordering on the absurd.
 
I am not a teacher.

Yes, it would be ironic.

I remember a case in London many years ago of an ambulance driver being guilty of a hit-and-run. Now, that's bordering on the absurd.

In Oscar Wilde's immortal words, "One would have to have a heart of stone not to laugh"....
 
In the same way, it's ironic when a tow truck breaks down and need to be towed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top