Not being able to dive down to the really good stuff.

neb090

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2022
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Taiwan
Current Location
Taiwan
I often think snorkelers get the short end of the stick, not being able to dive down to the really good stuff. But here, in shallow water, was a chance for non-divers to see what the fuss was all about.

Source: by Yvette Cardozo, 2013, ORTV.


In this sentence, could I say "to dive down to see the really good stuff"?
 

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
Yes you could, but why? The first principle of scuba diving is: look but don't touch.
 

Tarheel

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
@probus You can find out what's poisonous by touching it, but you probably don't want to do that.
😊
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
In this sentence, could I say "to dive down to see the really good stuff"?

That has a different meaning. Why would you want to change the meaning?

What are you trying to understand here? Is this a question about the meaning of the sentence? Or are you asking something about grammar? In the original sentence. the word to is a preposition, indicating direction of movement. Why would you want to get rid of that and replace it with a verb?
 

tedmc

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Malaysia
Current Location
Malaysia
It is understood that snorkelers and divers want to see things underwater.
 

neb090

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2022
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Taiwan
Current Location
Taiwan
That has a different meaning. Why would you want to change the meaning?

What are you trying to understand here? Is this a question about the meaning of the sentence? Or are you asking something about grammar? In the original sentence. the word to is a preposition, indicating direction of movement. Why would you want to get rid of that and replace it with a verb?
When I first read it, I just see to as an infinitive and that's why I want to add "see" after to. Now I know it is a preposition.

So if I add see, will it change its meaning as a whole?

Thanks.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Does "to" mean around the stuff, and "to see" mean you can touch the stuff?
"... dive down to the stuff" could be expressed as "... dive down as far as the stuff" or "... dive down until they reach the stuff".
"to see" means "to see" and "to touch" means "to touch". Why would you think "to see" meant that you can touch it. From where I am right now, I can see the sea. I'm too far away to touch it! Being able to see something doesn't necessarily mean you can touch it.
 

Tarheel

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I can see the sun, but I can't touch it.
😊
 
Top