[Grammar] The teachers have had some problems deciding ...

Status
Not open for further replies.

tri3hary

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Indonesian
Home Country
Indonesia
Current Location
Indonesia
Hello
There is a sentence that goes like this: The teachers have had some problems deciding when they should return the final papers to the students.

My questions are:
1. Is ...deciding when they should return the final papers .. a gerund phrase?
2. Why do we use the subject + verb formation after when.

Thank you
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Re: Gerund phrase and Embedded question

Hello.

[STRIKE]There is a sentence that goes like this[/STRIKE] I found the following sentence: The teachers have had some problems deciding when they should return the final papers to the students.

My questions are:

1. Is "deciding when they should return the final papers" a gerund phrase?
2. Why do we use the subject + verb formation after "when"?

Thank you.

Please note my corrections above. You need to tell us the source and author of that sentence.

I will let a grammarian answer your first question.
I assume you asked question #2 because a "When" question would use the inverted word order. That's true, but this isn't a "when" question. It's a statement that happens to include the word "when". The difference is clear when we use the direct/indirect speech method:

"When should we return the papers to the students?", the teachers wondered.
We are teachers and we are wondering when we should return the papers to the students.
 

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Welcome back after your five-year quarantine, tri3hary.:-D

Please note that I have changed your thread title.

Extract from the Posting Guidelines:

'Thread titles should include all or part of the word/phrase being discussed.'
 

Phaedrus

Banned
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
The teachers have had some problems deciding when they should return the final papers to the students.

My questions are:
1. Is ...deciding when they should return the final papers .. a gerund phrase?

Historically, the type of construction you are asking about relates to a construction in which "deciding when . . ." would function as the object of a preposition, typically "in": The teachers have had some problems in deciding when they should return the final papers to the students.

If that were the construction in play, then "deciding" would be what most ESL teachers incorrectly call a gerund. And if you analyze your sentence as containing an omitted preposition before "deciding," then you could say that is the construction in play.

That "deciding" is not, even in the prepositional construction, a gerund may be seen by considering that a gerund is a verbal noun and nouns do not have direct objects. Thus, we should not be able to say, e.g., "They have had some problems in deciding this matter." Here is the related gerund construction:

They have had some problems in the deciding of this matter.

Now, it would be ungrammatical to say, *[strike]They have had some problems the deciding of this matter[/strike]. So the gerund analysis doesn't work, technically. However, if you go in for the omitted-preposition analysis, you could say that "deciding . . ." is a nominal participial phrase: a participial verb phrase that functions as a substantive.

Another analysis that is possible is one on which the "deciding" phrase is an Integrated Participial Clause (De Smet, 2013*), a participial phrase that does not function as a substantive but as an obligatory adjunct or complement in the construction beginning with "had some problems . . . ."

One piece of evidence favoring the closer "integration" of these participial clauses, as opposed to other participial adjuncts, is that elements within such participial phrases can easily be relativized (in relative clauses), whereas that is not possible with participial adjuncts not so "integrated." Consider these sentences:

There is a matter that they have had some problems deciding _.
?* This is the matter that they sat at the table deciding _.

2. Why do we use the subject + verb formation after when.
Subject-auxiliary inversion is used in root questions, not in embedded questions. The "when"-clause following "deciding" is an embedded question.

They should return them then.

When should they return them?

[strike]*When they should return them?[/strike]

I wonder when they should return them.

[strike]*I wonder when should they return them.[/strike]

They decided when they should return them.
[strike]*They decided when should they return them.[/strike]

------------------------------------------
*
De Smet, H. (2013). Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
Last edited:

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Here's an answer from an ESL teacher.

1) Apparently not (see Phaedrus' comprehensive explanation above). Why do you want to know that anyway? Are you sure that's the question you really meant to ask?

2) In your example sentence, an ESL teacher might call the part reading when they should return ... a 'wh-clause'. You can look that up if you want to learn more about how to use this kind of clause.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top