these are open-ended

Status
Not open for further replies.

GoodTaste

Key Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
I understand "these are open-ended" as "these arms-control talks are open to all other countries as well." Am I on the right track?

==================
First, researchers and security experts need to find deterrence strategies that are acceptable to three nations. China should join arms-control talks with the United States and Russia, even if these are open-ended. Second, international security discussions need to encompass emerging technologies and conventional weapons, as well as nuclear ones. Third, non-nuclear states, including Japan — my nation — need to be at the table.

Source: Nature 04 AUGUST 2020
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02282-9
 

SoothingDave

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
No. It's about what the end is expected to be, not about how having other countries there. Why would you think that?

Also, the third point is about other states needing to be there. Context!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top