Why did you tear the cloth instead of cutting it with scissors?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Luis Flmg

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2022
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Portuguese
Home Country
Brazil
Current Location
Brazil

Why did you tear the cloth instead of cutting it with scissors?

Can I rephrase the sentence above using "and not" without a change in meaning?
Why did you tear the cloth and not...... it with scissors?
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
You could end with "and not cut it with scissors", but you can't make your suggested change if you want to keep "cutting". Also, there's really no need for "with scissors". We already know the sentence is about cloth so "cut(ting) it" suffices.
 

teechar

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 18, 2015
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Iraq
Current Location
Iraq
Can I rephrase the sentence above using "and not" without a change in meaning?
As emsr2d2 has pointed out above, "and not cut it" is a grammatical option. However, be careful that this solution may not always preserve the meaning.

Consider, for example:
A-1: Why did you boil those chestnuts instead of roasting them?
A-2: Why did you boil those chestnuts and not roast them?

"A-1" is clear and unambiguous. However, "A-2" can imply that the original instruction/expectation was for the person to boil the chestnuts and roast them. Do you see the problem?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top