#1  
Old 13-Nov-2005, 03:41
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2
Member Type: Student or Learner
Default Reinterpreting "Turn the other cheek."

Walter Wink, of Spirituality & Health, has it right I think.

Here is my analysis, written before reading his.

An alternate interpretation of the scripture.

Background:

At this time, a thief would have a hand chopped off. People ate from a common plate of food in the middle of the table. One used one hand to wipe after defecating and the OTHER hand to take food from the common plate. Thus a man with one hand was not welcome to eat with others. Usually, the eating hand was the right hand.

Thus if one were struck on the right cheek by the back of someone's right hand, it was an insult and a provocation.

What happens if one turns the OTHER cheek, presumably to be struck with the OTHER hand?

I believe if you were struck AGAIN with the OTHER hand, it would be a grievous insult and a major provocation.

This leads me to conclude that the gesture of turning the other cheek is a challenge to the striker. It says, "Look you jerk, you hit me. I'm raising the stakes. If you hit me again with the OTHER hand, you will demonstrate that you are a major jerk, unworthy of any admiration or status."

This is, thus, a non-violent act intended to SHAME the other person, perhaps even into backing down and apologizing. It is good social policy since it leaves everyone involved with their teeth and eyes intact.

Does that make sense to you?

Similarly, the act of offering your shirt as well as your coat leaves you naked in the street. This was a big deal in those days, and even today. Again it challenges and shames the other person.
  #2  
Old 13-Nov-2005, 15:59
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 34,313
Home Country: UK
Native Language: British English
Current Location: Philippines
Member Type: English Teacher
Default Re: Reinterpreting "Turn the other cheek."

Would the person necessarily strike with their 'food' hand?
  #3  
Old 13-Nov-2005, 18:38
Newbie
Threadstarter  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2
Member Type: Student or Learner
Default Re: Reinterpreting "Turn the other cheek."

No, they wouldn't necessarily strike first with their food hand, but the alternative is so egregious that it would be mentioned specifically in the story.
  #4  
Old 14-Nov-2005, 05:20
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 34,313
Home Country: UK
Native Language: British English
Current Location: Philippines
Member Type: English Teacher
Default Re: Reinterpreting "Turn the other cheek."

What do you mean about offering your shirt at the end? Are you referring to the 'lose your shirt' idiom?
  #5  
Old 12-Jan-2006, 15:52
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 31
Default Re: Reinterpreting "Turn the other cheek."

Hi,
how about if that person would hit you again with the same hand and not with the other hand, by just changing his rotatory movement, what would that mean then?
thanks.

Last edited by italianbrother; 12-Jan-2006 at 16:42.
  #6  
Old 17-Feb-2006, 07:18
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 34,313
Home Country: UK
Native Language: British English
Current Location: Philippines
Member Type: English Teacher
Default Re: Reinterpreting "Turn the other cheek."

Stand still and let's test it out.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
reinterpreting, quotturn, other, cheekquot


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 19:21.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.