#1  
Old 24-Jul-2003, 22:23
Red5's Avatar
Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,166
Home Country: England
Native Language: British English
Current Location: England
Member Type: Interested in Language
Default The Origin of Language Debate

Webpage Link: The Origin of Language Debate
__________________
Red5
Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com
  #2  
Old 08-Jan-2004, 13:49
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

is cajun the origin of languages?
  #3  
Old 09-Jan-2004, 18:37
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 34,359
Home Country: UK
Native Language: British English
Current Location: Philippines
Member Type: English Teacher
Default

Not that I know of- it's the language spoken in parts of Louisiana as I understand it.
  #4  
Old 11-Apr-2004, 16:38
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Origin of language

I found your remarks most illuminating. I failed to find your name. Please tell me who you are. Thanks.
  #5  
Old 13-Apr-2004, 13:36
Red5's Avatar
Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com
Threadstarter  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,166
Home Country: England
Native Language: British English
Current Location: England
Member Type: Interested in Language
Default

Unfortunately, the original essay seems to have been taken down or moved from its original location.
__________________
Red5
Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com
  #6  
Old 13-Apr-2004, 18:02
MikeNewYork's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,073
Member Type: Academic
Default Re: The Origin of Language Debate

It seems to me that these are very weak:

Point 3 - There is no language organ
While the location and nature of the LAD (Language Acquisition Device) remain little understood or even identified, language is cerebral, so it is contained within one organ, the brain, about which we know very little.

Ponit 4 - There are no language genes

This is only true if number 3 is, which I find questionable. The fact that the human genome has been published does not mean that we have grasped how it all works, especially diachronically.

  #7  
Old 13-Apr-2004, 19:53
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 34,359
Home Country: UK
Native Language: British English
Current Location: Philippines
Member Type: English Teacher
Default

They don't offer concrete proof.
  #8  
Old 13-Apr-2004, 20:04
MikeNewYork's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,073
Member Type: Academic
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdol
They don't offer concrete proof.
Neither side has concrete proof. But those two rebuttals are almost worse than nothing. :wink:
  #9  
Old 13-Apr-2004, 22:22
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 34,359
Home Country: UK
Native Language: British English
Current Location: Philippines
Member Type: English Teacher
Default

The first is a bit shaky and this does hole the second below the waterline. The language gene theories are at best in their infancy. As far as I know, there has been some evidence to suggest that one gene might affect language learning if it is missing.
  #10  
Old 10-Jun-2004, 18:35
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Is there anyone who would like to argue about the relationship between the origin of language and second language acquisition?
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
origin, language, debate


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Language teaching problem Eway General Language Discussions 18 02-Apr-2009 02:36
The English language and its varieties italianbrother Ask a Teacher 7 22-Feb-2007 12:34
origin of language Anonymous Ask a Teacher 2 18-Sep-2004 18:16
ORIGIN OF LANGUAGE fariha Ask a Teacher 4 06-Sep-2004 20:56


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:29.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.