2Likes -
2 Post By 2006
-
"and" as a linking word vs parallelism?
Hello, guys,
I've just entered a rather simple yet confusing sentence.
1.The frog was driven over and dead.
2. The frog was driven over and died.
Which one is correct?
In sentence 1, is it grammatically correct when "dead" shares "was" with "driven over?" I'm asking mainly because the former is an adjective
while the later is part of a passive voice. I assumed sentence 1 won't be acceptable grammatically because it is in conflict with parallelism.
Am I on the right track?
-
Re: "and" as a linking word vs parallelism?

Originally Posted by
kiweep7
Hello, guys,
I've just entered a rather simple yet confusing sentence.
1.The frog was driven over and dead.
2. The frog was driven over and died.
Which one is correct?
In sentence 1, is it grammatically correct when "dead" shares "was" with "driven over?" I'm asking mainly because the former is an adjective
while the later is part of a passive voice. I assumed sentence 1 won't be acceptable grammatically because it is in conflict with parallelism.
Am I on the right track?
Welcome!
Don't pay too much attention to parallelism; pay attention to what the sentence is saying.
Sentence 2. is correct. It means that the frog was driven over and, as a result, it died.
You have to imagine a very unlikely scenario to have sentence 1. make sense.
-
Re: "and" as a linking word vs parallelism?
Cheers, 2006!
Your explanation and point of view do help a lot!
What about grammatically?
I mean, how should I approach sentence 1 grammatically in order to
lead my students to seeing its flaw in grammar?
I appreciate any suggestion!
-
Re: "and" as a linking word vs parallelism?

Originally Posted by
kiweep7
Cheers, 2006!
Your explanation and point of view do help a lot!
What about grammatically?
I mean, how should I approach sentence 1 grammatically in order to
lead my students to seeing its flaw in grammar?
I appreciate any suggestion!
I suggest you start with the correct sentence 2.
Sentence 2. says that the frog was driven over (passive part), and as a result of that it, the frog, died (active part).
You need a verb at the end of the sentence, not an adjective. "died" is a verb and "dead" is an adjective.
What did the frog do? It died. (verb)
You cannot say 'It dead.'
Does that help?
-
Re: "and" as a linking word vs parallelism?

Originally Posted by
kiweep7
Cheers, 2006!
Your explanation and point of view do help a lot!
What about grammatically?
I mean, how should I approach sentence 1 grammatically in order to
lead my students to seeing its flaw in grammar?
I appreciate any suggestion!
I agree with 2006, but if you must start with sentence 1, consider what you'd have to do to make it make sense:
The frog had been driven over and was dead.
You need the two tenses to capture the sequencing; if you leave 'dead' as a simple participle (with no auxiliary), you need to stick with sentence 2.
b
Similar Threads
-
By maral55 in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 16
Last Post: 27-May-2009, 16:22
-
By ScaryEders in forum General Language Discussions
Replies: 5
Last Post: 06-May-2009, 07:15
-
By forum_mail in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 7
Last Post: 12-Apr-2009, 18:38
-
By RobertMay in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 3
Last Post: 25-Mar-2009, 19:22
-
By Anonymous in forum General Language Discussions
Replies: 21
Last Post: 31-May-2003, 22:43
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1