10Likes -
1 Post By JohnParis -
2 Post By bhaisahab -
3 Post By 5jj -
4 Post By billmcd
-
charged for/with
The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) announced that a civilian clerical officer was on Thursday charged in court for forgery, cheating, criminal breach of trust and conversion of proceeds of crime in the course of his employment with the ministry.
Is 'for' correct? I was taught that it should be 'charged with'?
Thanks.
-
Re: charged for/with
I have always used "charged with" as well, but I cannot say for certain whether or not "charged for" is incorrect.
Let's wait for our colleagues.
-
Re: charged for/with

Originally Posted by
JohnParis
I have always used "charged with" as well, but I cannot say for certain whether or not "charged for" is incorrect.
Let's wait for our colleagues.
I'd say "charged with".
-
Re: charged for/with
I'd say that 'charged for' is not natural English in that context.
Context is important. Please provide enough for us to be able to deal effectively with your question.
Your thread title should include all or part of the word/phrase being discussed.
If you just want to know the meaning of a word, try OneLook Dictionary Search first.
-
Re: charged for/with

Originally Posted by
JohnParis
I have always used "charged with" as well, but I cannot say for certain whether or not "charged for" is incorrect.
Let's wait for our colleagues.
Agree. charged with/arrested for
Similar Threads
-
By Tan Elaine in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 26-Oct-2011, 06:59
-
By arzgol in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 3
Last Post: 02-Aug-2011, 22:51
-
By SunMoon in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 04-May-2009, 12:16
-
By lauraguan in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 14-Apr-2009, 13:06
-
By Tan Elaine in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 8
Last Post: 13-Aug-2008, 06:21
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1