- 3 Post By Raymott
was believed to be
1) The murderer was believed to be a hired assassin.
2) The murderer was believed to have been a hired assassin.
I have no idea what's the difference between these two sentences. Could anybody help me?
Very appreciated. Thanks!
Re: was believed to be
In practice, they are often used to mean the same thing. The context of your sentences makes the meaning clear - "The murderer was a hired assassin, it was believed."
Originally Posted by ronmecer
Here is a sentence where you need the second form: "The murderer was believed to have been an English teacher before he became a hired assassin." It's a similar requirement for that of the past perfect. You're looking at two events/states in the past. "It was believed that the murderer had been an English teacher before becoming a hired assassin."
Last edited by Raymott; 30-Mar-2012 at 18:28.
By keannu in forum Ask a Teacher
Last Post: 24-Oct-2011, 11:32
By Tan Elaine in forum Ask a Teacher
Last Post: 21-Oct-2011, 21:33
By caronmi in forum Ask a Teacher
Last Post: 04-May-2011, 13:44
By Ju in forum Ask a Teacher
Last Post: 03-Jun-2009, 00:32
By sitifan in forum Ask a Teacher
Last Post: 28-Nov-2008, 13:16
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO