NOT A TEACHER
Yes, they're the same kind of "of". Leaving out "of" is not possible.
Your gift should be of good quality but modestly priced.
Your gift should be good quality but modestly priced.![]()
Can someone explain the following "of"?
Your gift should be of good quality but modestly priced. When you plan to give a gift to several people within an organisation, be sure to give a gift of greater value to the senior person.
Are they both the same type of "of"? Can I drop the first one and just say "be good quality"?
How about this one, is it the same kind of "of" -
be of help
Any other examples of the structure and how to use would be much appreciated.
Thank you.
NOT A TEACHER
Yes, they're the same kind of "of". Leaving out "of" is not possible.
Your gift should be of good quality but modestly priced.
Your gift should be good quality but modestly priced.![]()
Hello.
This sort of '(be+) of + (abstract) noun' basically functions like an adjective in my opinion.
Please see here (definition #9): Merriam-Webster's Learner's Dictionary
be of value = be valuable
be of help = be helpful
be of quality = be very good
etc...
I hope I'm not talking nonsense.
Thanks for the replies.
The Merriam-Webster's Learner's Dictionary was very helpful.
The "be" is also confusing. Can you correct/complete the following -
be of value
be= ?????
of= preposition
value= abstract noun (must this always be an abstract noun?)
be valuable
be= ?????
valuable= adjective
Am I correct to say that "be of ......." is the abstract noun form and "be ......" is the adjective form??
Is the "of" preposition always required??
Thanks.