Which grammar book are you referring to?
1. I'm accustomed to drive a car.
2. I'm accustomed to driving a car.
I thought only 2 was grammatical but one of my grammar book say
both are correct.
Are the both sentences grammatical?
Which grammar book are you referring to?
NOT A TEACHER
You're right, #1 is wrong. See:
Verbs Followed by Gerunds or Infinitives
http://www.englishpage.com/gerunds/a...erund_list.htm
But please do tell us which book you are referring to.
There are like hundreds and thousands of English grammar books written by Korean teachers
in Korea.I have more than 20 grammar books myself.
I want to tell you what the book is
but this time the grammar book is from the web, I mean I downloaded the book from a
English study community which is the most famous and popular one among Korean students and
teachers. If you want to have a look I can sent the file to you via email or whatever but
you can't understand the book since it is written in Korean.![]()
I feel that be accustomed to can be followed by either form in BrE, a feeling shared by Swan (2005.299). There are 74 citations for accustomed to + the first form of the verb in the BNC.
Context is important. Please provide enough for us to be able to deal effectively with your question.
Your thread title should include all or part of the word/phrase being discussed.
If you just want to know the meaning of a word, try OneLook Dictionary Search first.
My suggestion is that you delete this book from your files as it contains incorrect material. Part of the job of being a teacher is to teach the subject matter and also teach students how to reason. It is faulty reasoning on your part to assume that some members of this forum cannot read Korean.
Last edited by Chicken Sandwich; 23-Oct-2012 at 16:28.