![]() |
Plural of the word "status" Hi My colleagues and I are debating the plural form of the word "STATUS". I'm convinced that it is "STATES", but others insist that it is "STATUSES", which to me sounds incorrect. Checking a number of online dictionaries, produces different results: some say it is a valid word, whilst others do not. Any comments or clarifications greatly accepted. Chris. |
Merriam-Webster give it as 'statuses': http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...&va=status Wouldn't the other form be 'statii'? http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...UK%7CcountryGB ;-) |
Re: Plural of the word "status" Quote:
|
I could only find it through Google; I'd never heard it. ;-) |
Quote:
|
I think the 'status\states' idea comes from a confusion with 'analysis\analyses'. ;-) |
Quote:
|
Re: Plural of the word "status" Note that the plural of status is not statuses or even stati. Like salmon and sheep, the plural of status is simply status. However, according to the Oxford English Dictionary these are pronounced differently: the ‘u’ in the singular is as the ‘u’ in datum, whereas the plural has an ‘u’ as in tune. |
Re: Plural of the word "status" Quote:
The only admissible English plural for "status" is "statuses". If people aren't happy with that, they need to paraphrase. b |
Re: Plural of the word "status" Quote:
Main Entry:status Pronunciation:*st*]d.*s, *sta], ]t*s sometimes *st*] or *st*] Function:noun Inflected Form:-es Usage:often attributive Etymology:Latin * more at STATE |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 18:09. |
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 UsingEnglish.com