Oh, thank you so much.
And thank you for being impressed with my credentials. I was only trying to camouflage my non-native origins. Nationality seems to be worth more than any education or experience.
During the
celta course it was all about being
student centred, that is give them tasks they can work on alone or in small groups. In contrast to being teacher centred, the traditional way what I did – and what means lecturing a passive class – was fiercely criticized. So the teacher would reduce “the real teaching” to a minimum and rather monitor activities and correct them.
There was so much emphasis on this, and on Scrivener being the bible of
esl teaching that I assumed that everybody is familiar with this. I will have to meditate on something else or leave it out then.
I am sure that there are pros and cons to this approach, but in any case I would think that students must reach a certain level of progress before the approach can be applied, particularly with more elementary levels. If you think this is a generally accepted and applied procedure, then leave it in.
Achieved remarkable results
(documented?) … At the academy we used to have the lists with the marks hanging on the wall. And also the average and top results per teacher. I don't have anything that I could show to prove it. So do I leave it out then?
If you leave it in, be prepared to discuss it and how results were measured..
Taught intensive
(?) courses: should I detail this any further? 3-week intensive courses for beginners and intermediate students?
What made instruction "intensive"? long term holiday makers (?) 
that's how we call them. Not really expats as they might migrate between Spain and their home country like birds. But maybe expats is a better word that everybody is familiar with.
Either way, is it relevant?
I wonder why you can't see the bullets. They appear on my screen...
Thank you so much again.