Forum newsfeeds
Forum Newsfeeds


Sites for Teachers

Sites for Teachers


Go Back   UsingEnglish.com ESL Forum > Learning English > English Idioms and Sayings > English Phrasal Verbs

Poll: Which would you use?
Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.
Poll Options
Which would you use?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 20-Oct-2003, 20:58
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Country: UK
Posts: 25,231
Current Location: Phnom Penh
First Language: English
Thanks: 2
Thanked 308 Times in 280 Posts
Tdol has disabled reputation
Default

The OED calls 'not' an adverb. The more I think about the term 'paticle', the less I like it.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 20-Oct-2003, 21:03
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Country: UK
Posts: 25,231
Current Location: Phnom Penh
First Language: English
Thanks: 2
Thanked 308 Times in 280 Posts
Tdol has disabled reputation
Default Re: Not I

http://www.usingenglish.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1764

)
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-Feb-2006, 23:12
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 1
First Language: English
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Phospheratu is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Not I

This could be either, depending on the circumstance.

Q: To whom did she give the answer?
A: Not me. (She did not give the answer to me.)

or

Q: Who will bell the cat?
A: Not I. (I will not bell the cat.)

Last edited by Phospheratu; 09-Feb-2006 at 23:20.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-Apr-2006, 07:29
Isra's Avatar
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Country: Albania
Posts: 26
Current Location: Albania
First Language: albanian
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Isra is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Not I

Excuse me, finally which is the right answer, I'm really confused by all this explanations..

So, If we use both, isn't wrong???
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 19-Aug-2006, 21:29
Key Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,025
Current Location: Canada
First Language: English
Thanks: 4
Thanked 478 Times in 440 Posts
riverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Not I

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casiopea View Post

According to traditional grammarians (Prescriptivist), linking verbs such as forms of 'to be' (is, are, was, were, etc.) link the subject with its complement. Complements refer back to the subject so they are considered 'nominative' (subject) in form. Which means, pronouns coming after the linking verb 'to be' should be nominative in form: I, she, he, we, they. For example,

But, keep in mind, those examples are based on what Prescriptivists would advise. As for Descriptivists, they'd point out that "me" is more popular these days than "I". The reason being, the pronoun comes after the verb which is a position reserved for objects, and hence speakers tend to choose "me" over "I" in that context.
I think this makes it sound as if there was something to the prescriptive rule, Casiopea. It was wrong from the get go, penned as it was using Latin as a guideline.

Language rules are not simply a matter of popularity. Just because Latin deals with something in a certain manner [using the nominative in predicative complements] doesn't mean that English must follow that rule.

English is English and Latin is Latin and never the twain shall meet, though they might pass each other in the night.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 19-Aug-2006, 21:33
Key Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,025
Current Location: Canada
First Language: English
Thanks: 4
Thanked 478 Times in 440 Posts
riverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Not I

Quote:
Originally Posted by Isra View Post
Excuse me, finally which is the right answer, I'm really confused by all this explanations..
So, If we use both, isn't wrong???
Both are right, Isra, and both are in common use in English.


"... the nominative form I ... belongs to (very) fromal style, while accusative me is neutral or informal."

[CGEL at page 9]


Results 1 - 10 of about 5,780,000 English pages for "it was I".

Results 1 - 10 of about 2,400,000 English pages for "it was me".

Results 1 - 10 of about 1,240,000 English pages for "it was she".

Results 1 - 10 of about 4,970,000 English pages for "it was her".
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 19-Aug-2006, 23:07
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Country: England
Posts: 2,126
Current Location: SE England
First Language: British English
Thanks: 2
Thanked 79 Times in 78 Posts
MrPedantic will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Not I

Out of interest, Riverkid, how are you excluding non-complements from your googles?

For instance, a simple google on "it was I" brings up cases such as:

1. A solemn thing it was, I said.

2. I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing...

Similarly, "it was she" brings up e.g.

3. She lived her life the way - she wanted to live it. Was she upset that she wasn't up on the Hill?

4. It took her just under an hour to do whatever it was she did.

While "it was her" includes e.g.

5. Specialist Sabrina Harman, one of the accused MPs, testified that it was her job to keep detainees awake

MrP
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 20-Aug-2006, 05:28
Key Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,025
Current Location: Canada
First Language: English
Thanks: 4
Thanked 478 Times in 440 Posts
riverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of lightriverkid is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Not I

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPedantic View Post
Out of interest, Riverkid, how are you excluding non-complements from your googles?
For instance, a simple google on "it was I" brings up cases such as:

I made no attempt to exclude non-complements, Mr Pedantic. I didn't do a simple google. I did an "with the exact phrase" search. Admittedly they aren't perfect, but they clearly indicate that these are very common collocations.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 20-Aug-2006, 20:53
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Country: England
Posts: 2,126
Current Location: SE England
First Language: British English
Thanks: 2
Thanked 79 Times in 78 Posts
MrPedantic will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Not I

Yes, they are very common; but if you look at the first three pages of the "exact search" on "it was I", for example, you'll find that 10 out of 30 (at most) relate to "It was I" in the sense "it was me".

MrP
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 20-Aug-2006, 22:32
Key Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Country: USA
Posts: 1,838
Current Location: North Carolina
First Language: English
Thanks: 0
Thanked 64 Times in 58 Posts
mykwyner will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Not I

How about this:

"I have to fire someone today."

"Not me, please."

This is not idiomatic. I don't want to be the object of the firing. "Don't fire me, please."

Also, I've always thought of particles as prepositions that were pressed into service as idiomatic and superflous adverbs:

Start up your engine.
Flatten out the newspaper.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:21.


vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2002 - 2008 UsingEnglish.com