Quote:
Originally Posted by the concierge exceptions need rules to exist
I don't get your table - size doesn't have anything to do wth whether something is countable or not |
Hi, the concierge!
I know what you mean.
Well... the reason that I used '...in size' is that...I wanted to illustrate...
'The bigger the thing(noun), the more concrete it becomes.' And it means you can easily see and grab(, or whatever you may call it..) it. You can count it because you can see it. If you can't see it, you can't count it. (The smaller the thing(noun), Am I correct?
For example...
1) sand
Each tiny piece of sand, which is barely recognizable, sort of...gather together at one place...and you see 'sand' as it is. There are too many pieces of sand to count. (May I call it 'collective'?) Therefore it is 'uncoutable'.
2)coffee
You can see it. But you can't grab it because it's a liquid. You can't recognize it as a 'concrete object'.
Therefore it is 'uncountable'.
If it is recognized as a 'concrete object', it can be 'countable'. For example...if the coffee is in a cup, it is more concrete than just 'coffee'.
In that case, we can say 'Two coffees' or 'Three coffees'. (Am I wrong?)
3) air
You can't see it. Therefore it is 'uncountable'
4) love
You can't see it. Therefore 'uncountable'.
As for 3) and 4), when you see(use) them as 'concrete objects', they can be countable.
Oh...it's so hard to explain them in English..but...

this is one of the ways I use to tell 'countable' from 'uncountable'.