sb70012
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2013
- Member Type
- Interested in Language
- Native Language
- Persian
- Home Country
- Iran
- Current Location
- Iran
1. Luckily, only a person was injured. = (incorrect)
2. Luckily, only one person was injured. = (correct)
Source: ABC of Common Grammatical Errors by
Nigel D Turton. Part 3 , a/an Use
Hello teachers,
As you know when we need to emphasize “how many”, we can use one. See:
Luckily, only one saucer was broken. (not two, three, etc) = Correct
Luckily, only a saucer was broken. (not a cup, plate, etc) = Correct
If so, then why number 1 is incorrect? If (a saucer) is correct then why (a person) doesn’t fit in number 1?
Many thanks in advance.
***************************************
One English told me:
Your book is wrong because:
'Luckily, only a person was injured in the accident (no animals were harmed).' = can be correct too
But what's your opinion?
Thank you.
2. Luckily, only one person was injured. = (correct)
Source: ABC of Common Grammatical Errors by
Nigel D Turton. Part 3 , a/an Use
Hello teachers,
As you know when we need to emphasize “how many”, we can use one. See:
Luckily, only one saucer was broken. (not two, three, etc) = Correct
Luckily, only a saucer was broken. (not a cup, plate, etc) = Correct
If so, then why number 1 is incorrect? If (a saucer) is correct then why (a person) doesn’t fit in number 1?
Many thanks in advance.
***************************************
One English told me:
Your book is wrong because:
'Luckily, only a person was injured in the accident (no animals were harmed).' = can be correct too
But what's your opinion?
Thank you.