a person vs. one person

Status
Not open for further replies.

sb70012

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Persian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
Iran
1. Luckily, only a person was injured. = (incorrect)
2. Luckily, only one person was injured. = (correct)

Source: ABC of Common Grammatical Errors by
Nigel D Turton. Part 3 , a/an Use


Hello teachers,

As you know when we need to emphasize “how many”, we can use one. See:
Luckily, only one saucer was broken. (not two, three, etc) = Correct
Luckily, only a saucer was broken. (not a cup, plate, etc) = Correct
If so, then why number 1 is incorrect? If (a saucer) is correct then why (a person) doesn’t fit in number 1?


Many thanks in advance.

***************************************

One English told me:

Your book is wrong because:

'Luckily, only a person was injured in the accident (no animals were harmed).' = can be correct too


But what's your opinion?

Thank you.​
 

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Before replying to this, Using English teachers, please read this first. Only partial context has been given here.

I did not say the book was wrong, and sb knows that.

Rover
 
Last edited:

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
1. Luckily, only a person was injured. = (incorrect)
2. Luckily, only one person was injured. = (correct)

Source: ABC of Common Grammatical Errors by
Nigel D Turton. Part 3 , a/an Use


Hello teachers,

As you know when we need to emphasize “how many”, we can use one. See:
Luckily, only one saucer was broken. (not two, three, etc) = Correct
Luckily, only a saucer was broken. (not a cup, plate, etc) = Correct
If so, then why number 1 is incorrect? If (a saucer) is correct then why (a person) doesn’t fit in number 1?


Many thanks in advance.

***************************************

One English told me:

Your book is wrong because:

'Luckily, only a person was injured in the accident (no animals were harmed).' = can be correct too


But what's your opinion?

Thank you.​

There was nothing at all wrong with Rover's explanation of the grammar. The difficulty with your first sentence is that we really wouldn't consider an injury to a person (as opposed to an animal, a tree, etc) to be lucky. If you change the species, it works just fine.

There was an accident on the highway. The car was totaled, but luckily only a deer was injured.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top