Are the following sentences grammatically correct ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mr_Joe

Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Sinhalese
Home Country
Sri Lanka
Current Location
Sri Lanka
1. If the price of petrol had not increased, the car hadn't been sold. --> is this correct ?

OR.. should it be corrected as : If the price of petrol had not been increased, the car hadn't been sold.


2. The girl you gave a book to yesterday, is in my class. --> can we say this with out "to" ??? is it wrong ?:shock::?::shock:
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
1. If the price of petrol had not increased, the car hadn't been sold. --> is this correct ?

OR.. should it be corrected as : If the price of petrol had not been increased, the car hadn't been sold.

Neither one makes any sense.

If the price of petrol had not increased, the car would not have sold. (This is illogical but grammatical.)
If the price of petrol had increased, the car would not have sold. (Logical and grammatical.)
If the price of petrol had not increased, the car would have sold. (Logical and grammatical.)

Please start a new thread for question #2.
 
Last edited:

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
The last two examples are identical.

If the price of petrol had not increased, the car would not have been sold. (The owner could have afforded to run it.)
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Thanks, I've edited it so that my three examples are now different. :oops:
 

Mr_Joe

Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Sinhalese
Home Country
Sri Lanka
Current Location
Sri Lanka
Thanks for replying !

If the price of petrol had increased, the car would not have sold.

My question is : If the price of petrol had increased --- > shouldn't this be in passive voice ??? (here who had increased the price ?? -- if there is no nay clear subject, shouldn't it be in passive voice ???) otherwise what are the Subject and Object of this sentence ? just see this : If Joe had increased the house rent --> here joe is a person (Subject) and the house-rent is the Object !!!
 

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
It doesn't matter who increased the price of petrol. If you want to use the passive voice, you could say 'If the price of petrol had been increased...' but the original is just fine.


Please note that a better title would have been The price of petrol.

Extract from the Posting Guidelines:

'Thread titles should include all or part of the word/phrase being discussed.'
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
The subject of the sentence is "price" and the verb is "had (not) increased". It is not passive voice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top