employer has be should be you think

[svetlana14]

Can you please tell me the exact phrase at 04:53 in [

]? I hear a sort of "employer has be should be you think". Thanks.

 

[jutfrank]

how relevant ... should the amount of money that employer has be, Shabya, do you think?

He's addressing the caller by name.

 

[svetlana14]

Does "be" relate to "should"? Is it admissable to put "be" between "should" and a clause. Thank you.

 

[jutfrank]

Yes. No.

 

[emsr2d2]

Does "be" relate to "should"? just one space after a question mark please Is it admissible OK/correct to put "be" between "should" and a clause? Thank you.

I'm not sure what you're asking with your second question. "Be" is already between "should" and the final clause. The original sentence is absolutely fine.

 

[Ostap]

I'm not sure what you're asking with your second question. "Be" is already between "should" and the final clause.

She was asking if this was possible:

How relevant should be the amount of money that employer has?

 

[svetlana14]

Yes. No.

Is "How relevant should be the amount of money that employer has?" more correct usage and under what circumstances? Could you please enlarge on this.

 

[emsr2d2]

Is "How relevant should be the amount of money that employer has?" more correct usage and under what circumstances? Could you please enlarge on this.

No. (Note that something can't be "more correct". It's either correct or it's not.)

The grammatical and natural construction is "How relevant should the amount of money that employer has be?"

 

[svetlana14]

Can I say that something is "more right" or "more accurate" instead of "more correct"? I do understand that "black" can hardly be "more black" but how is to sound naturally?