Fish can mistakenly take in oil and get ill.

optimistic pessimist

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Member Type
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
In "Fish can mistakenly ingest oil and get ill." "ingest" is a low-frequency and unfamiliar word for many English learners. So, instead of using ingest, it is correct to use "eat" or"take in"?
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Can you cite the source of that sentence, please?
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
In "Fish can mistakenly ingest oil and get ill no full stop here", "ingest" is a low-frequency and unfamiliar word for many English learners. So, instead of using "ingest", it is correct to use "eat" or"take in"?
Note my punctuation corrections above.
 

optimistic pessimist

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Member Type
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
This is from a reading textbook titled ”Power Reading 3". "...Pollution is another reason animals become endangered. Many animals are very sensitive to what is in the water and air. Oil spills in oceans can make animals sick if they ingest the oil. It can burn their skin..." My question is if the "ingest" could be paraphrased by "take in" or other verbs including phrasal verbs.
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
From the context you've given, it seems to me the idea is that the toxic chemicals are ingested via the fish's food, which is contaminated with oil particles. That's just an educated guess. I don't really know.
 

optimistic pessimist

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Member Type
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
So, can "ingest" be paraphrased by "take in"? Or is "eat" or"drink" closer in meaning?
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
So, can "ingest" be paraphrased replaced by "take in" no question mark here or is "eat" or"drink" closer in meaning?
Both "eat" and "drink" suggest at least some element of purpose. However, "ingest" makes it clearer that the fish might end up with oil in its system accidentally (by eating something else that has been contaminated with oil).

I don't recommend that learners try to start sentences with "Or".

Changing one word for another (even if it's a phrasal verb) isn't really paraphrasing.
 
Top