[Grammar] Is "what" a conjunction in the "I did exactly what you sad"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zoli

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2015
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Hungarian
Home Country
Hungary
Current Location
Romania
Is the word "what" a conjunction in the phrase: "I did exactly what you said" or is it an adverb? I woud be grateful for any suggestion. Thank you!
 
Well, "exactly what you said" is a noun phrase there.

(Click "Thank" if you find this post useful.)
 
"I did exactly what you said" is a sentence, not a phrase.
 
Is the word "what" a conjunction ...?

NOT A TEACHER

Hello, Zoli:

According to my books, the answer is "No."

Most secondary school-level grammar books call it an indefinite relative pronoun.

1. It is a pronoun
2. It refers to another word called an antecedent.
3. But there is no antecedent that we can see, so the word "indefinite" is used.

In other words, those books tell us that "what" in your kind of sentence = "that which."

If you accept this analysis, then your sentence is the same as:

" I did exactly that which you said."


a. "That" is the object of "did."
b. "which you said" is an adjective clause that modifies "that."


House and Harman, Descriptive English Grammar (1931, 1950), pages 357- 359.

P.S. As Tarheel told us, some books simply explain that "what you said" is a noun clause introduced by the indefinite relative pronoun "what" (which is the object of the verb "said"). Pence and Emery, A Grammar of Every-Day English (1947 and 1963), page 162.
 
Last edited:
Interestingly, if what were replaced with as, an adverbial analysis of that sentence element would, I believe, make sense:

I did exactly as you said.

However, I'm just speaking hypothetically. That's a different sentence. Replacing what with as changes the structure.
 
I did exactly what you said.

It is a pronoun; it cannot be a conjunction since it doesn't behave like one.

This is a 'fused relative construction' where the antecedent and the relativised element are combined, or "fused" together into the single word "what" instead of being expressed separately. The underlined expression is thus not a clause but a noun phrase, whose head is fused with the first element in the relative clause. "What" is thus head of the noun phrase and object of the verb "said" in the relative clause.

At word level, "what" means "that which" (or "the thing which"), so the sentence has the same meaning as the non-fused "I did exactly that which you said".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top