much too burdensome for the smaller

Status
Not open for further replies.

keannu

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
Source : Hackers TOEIC , 165p

3. If the proposed rate increase is approved, taxes in the region will be ___________ burdensome for the smaller businesses to handle
a) much too b)such c)so d) not quite

The answer is a, but doesn't c)so work also? Is "much too" for negative nuance, while "so" is positive nuance?
Is this rule definite?
 

keannu

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
Why doesn't "so" work?
 

GoesStation

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Why doesn't "so" work?
It requires a reference. You could say, for example, Taxes in the region will be so burdensome for the smaller businesses that many will have to shut down.
 

keannu

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
I've seen lots of sentences like this.
"This is so embarrassing."
,where so can stand alone.

I don't understand the question and your explanation.
 

GoesStation

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I've seen lots of sentences like this:
"This is so embarrassing,"
where "so" can stand alone.
That's common in casual American English. Don't use it that way in formal writing — or when answering exam questions.

Please don't forget that quotation marks are required punctuation. Replace periods ("full stops" in British English) with commas within quotation marks when the quoted sentence ends with one.
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Let me change the direction of the thread away from the wrong answer (so) in order to turn to the right answer (much too). On the whole, I don't think it's a good idea to ask why something is wrong when you could be asking why something is right.

The way to get the right answer to this question is to spot the construction used, which can be written like this:

[much] too + adjective +for somebody + to do something

If the proposed rate increase is approved, taxes in the region will be much too burdensome for the smaller businesses to handle.

Of the choices given, only much too can fit this pattern.
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
In casual English, , this construction is possible:

so + adjective fo
r somebody + to do something:

If the proposed rate increase is approved, taxes in the region will be so burdensome for the smaller businesses to handle.

Okay, that's a good point. I think you've pointed out that for the test-taker to be able to select the right word, he needs to be able to understand the meaning of the sentence as a whole before identifying which construction is being used.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Source : Hackers TOEIC , 165p

3. If the proposed rate increase is approved, taxes in the region will be ___________ burdensome for the smaller businesses to handle
a) much too b)such c)so d) not quite

The answer is a, but doesn't c)so work also? Is "much too" for negative nuance, while "so" is positive nuance?
Is this rule definite?

What exactly is a positive tax burden? It wouldn't be a burden as burdens are negative.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top