chowbarry
Junior Member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2008
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Chinese
- Home Country
- China
- Current Location
- China
Please help me improve the following report on maintenance issues. Thank you.
a) We accept the planters handed back to us after a site inspection by our staff yesterday. As the conditions of your plants are up to our requirements and satisfaction, we agree with your suggested end of 3-month Defect Liability Period fall on 02.11.2016. On the arrangement of the affected trees, please keep providing updated information to us if possible advancing the next phase of your work. Indeed, there are six trees standing at the affected planters and tree transplantation works look necessarily to be conducted resulting from your planters reduction proposal.
b) In view of part of your proposed excavation area at this stage overlaying the works indicated onto Permit No. L3 of Environmental Protection Scheme (EPS), you are required to attentively protect the plants there during your work and replant all the shrubs being forced to be removed caused by your work as well as ensure the number and conditions of all the shrubs are equivalent to that of being before the work, together with a provision of 6-month maintenance period after being certified to meet our satisfaction and any requirements stated on EPS. If any amendment of your work is made, you must stop your work immediately and seek further advice from us.
c) Recapitulating a recent site meeting with two District Mayors in Mr. Gates and Mr. Baines, both of them quoted the local residents' disappointment about the non-provision of a public toilet at the vast open area of Eminent Road and they requested that there was an imminent and genuine need for the departments concerned to study on the installation a public toilet there. With your departments understandably being the responsible parties to manage the above issue, we wish to refer the case for your further study on the feasibility of the mayors' and the residents' suggestion and we expect you all to directly update them the progress of your respective studies afterwards.
d) The two traffic signs at our carpark have been installed for years, but recently accused by a member of public of being irregular from the standard stated by the Transport Department (TD), which are fearful of delivering a confused or false message to the car park users. Considering the public concern and the relatively low functional value of the signs, we, regardless of replacing those signs with new ones, propose to dismantle them with the assistance of the Technical Division at an estimated cost of $1,000 provided that we solicit the confirmation from the TD that the signs are located out of emergency access and the removal work will not product any adverse impact on road management or violate any traffic rules.
a) We accept the planters handed back to us after a site inspection by our staff yesterday. As the conditions of your plants are up to our requirements and satisfaction, we agree with your suggested end of 3-month Defect Liability Period fall on 02.11.2016. On the arrangement of the affected trees, please keep providing updated information to us if possible advancing the next phase of your work. Indeed, there are six trees standing at the affected planters and tree transplantation works look necessarily to be conducted resulting from your planters reduction proposal.
b) In view of part of your proposed excavation area at this stage overlaying the works indicated onto Permit No. L3 of Environmental Protection Scheme (EPS), you are required to attentively protect the plants there during your work and replant all the shrubs being forced to be removed caused by your work as well as ensure the number and conditions of all the shrubs are equivalent to that of being before the work, together with a provision of 6-month maintenance period after being certified to meet our satisfaction and any requirements stated on EPS. If any amendment of your work is made, you must stop your work immediately and seek further advice from us.
c) Recapitulating a recent site meeting with two District Mayors in Mr. Gates and Mr. Baines, both of them quoted the local residents' disappointment about the non-provision of a public toilet at the vast open area of Eminent Road and they requested that there was an imminent and genuine need for the departments concerned to study on the installation a public toilet there. With your departments understandably being the responsible parties to manage the above issue, we wish to refer the case for your further study on the feasibility of the mayors' and the residents' suggestion and we expect you all to directly update them the progress of your respective studies afterwards.
d) The two traffic signs at our carpark have been installed for years, but recently accused by a member of public of being irregular from the standard stated by the Transport Department (TD), which are fearful of delivering a confused or false message to the car park users. Considering the public concern and the relatively low functional value of the signs, we, regardless of replacing those signs with new ones, propose to dismantle them with the assistance of the Technical Division at an estimated cost of $1,000 provided that we solicit the confirmation from the TD that the signs are located out of emergency access and the removal work will not product any adverse impact on road management or violate any traffic rules.
