She is beautiful to look at vs it is beautiful to look at her

Status
Not open for further replies.

JACEK1

Key Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
Hello everybody!

I think that "She is beautiful to look at" mean exactly the same as "It is beautiful to look at her".

I think there is something fishy about the structure "It is beautiful to look at her".

What is your opinion on that?

Thank you.

Both the sentences were created by me.
 

teechar

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Feb 18, 2015
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Iraq
Current Location
Iraq
It's not a matter of something being fishy about it. It actually conveys a different meaning. Can you figure it out? ;-)
 

JACEK1

Key Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
I am not sure that I got it right but "She is beautiful to look at" expresses something active, the fact that she attracts attention and is in the middle of attention whereas "It is beautiful to look at her" means that the very thought of looking at her arouses feelings of beauty. :-o
I may be wrong.

Could someone confirm or denny? PLEASE.
 
Last edited:

Matthew Wai

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2013
Member Type
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
I think she is not necessarily beautiful in 'It is beautiful to look at her'.
 

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
'It is beautiful to look at her' is not a natural sentence.

I'd use a noun instead of an adjective.

My baby daughter is gorgeous. It is a delight/joy to look at her.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top