used to

GoldfishLord

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
that:
used to mean something or someone that has already been talked about or seen.

used to:
used to say that something happened continuously or frequently during a period in the past.

only to do something:
used to show that something is surprising or unexpected.

for:
used to indicate the place someone or something is going to or toward.

Source: some dictionaries.

"To" could not be substituted with "in order to".
Could "to", "to", and "to" each be substituted by "in order to"? What do you say?
 
Last edited:
 
As far as I remember, some said that "to", "to", and "to" each could be substituted by "in order to", but others disagreed.
I'm not sure which is correct.
 
I'm not sure why you're spending so much time with this micro-analysis. I wouldn't expect a word to mean anything all by itself.

I'm confused. I'm perplexed. Do you think replacing "to" with "in order to" is an improvement somehow?
 
I just wonder if "to", "to", and "to" each have the same role as "in order to".
I think that I could improve my English by exchanging opinions with native English speakers.
 
I just wonder if "to", "to", and "to" each have the same role as "in order to".
I think that I could improve my English by exchanging opinions with native English speakers.
In all of the original sentences, "in order" could be added before the coloured "to" with no change in meaning. However, it's unnecessary and, in my opinion, worse than the originals. I agree with Tarheel that there is no benefit in your spending time picking these things apart.
 
Back
Top