-
Diagramming Shakespeare 14
"I will tell thee in French, which I am sure will hang upon my tongue like a new-married wife about her husband's neck, hardly to be shook off. "
Henry V
-
Re: Diagramming Shakespeare 14

Originally Posted by
Frank Antonson
"I will tell thee in French, which I am sure will hang upon my tongue like a new-married wife about her husband's neck, hardly to be shook off. "
Henry V
Tomorrow, Frank. OK? I am in coma now. Tired.
-
Re: Diagramming Shakespeare 14
You won't be able to do that one in a coma.
-
Re: Diagramming Shakespeare 14

Originally Posted by
Frank Antonson
You won't be able to do that one in a coma.
I can't do it anyway.
Wait! I will work on it now.
-
Re: Diagramming Shakespeare 14
No picnic. 
-
Re: Diagramming Shakespeare 14
Wow! Nice work!
I think "to be shook" is passive voice and I am not so sure that it is an absolute phrase. Couldn't "that is" be understood before it and thereby connect it somehow to the understood "hangs"?
Still, nice work!
-
Re: Diagramming Shakespeare 14

Originally Posted by
Frank Antonson
Wow! Nice work!


Originally Posted by
Frank Antonson
I think "to be shook" is passive voice
So do I. 

Originally Posted by
Frank Antonson
and I am not so sure that it is an absolute phrase.
I think it is.

Originally Posted by
Frank Antonson
Couldn't "that is" be understood before it and thereby connect it somehow to the understood "hangs"?
Wait a minute.
No, I think not and I will tell you why. First, a comma is there. 'which' and not 'that' is used in non-reduced relative clauses. Second, the relative pronoun would refer back to the closest noun: neck. Not okay.
Was sagen Sie darüber, Herr Frank?
-
Re: Diagramming Shakespeare 14
Hier ist was ich denke daruber ---
First, I'm in school and they still have not been able to unblock the images, so I am working from memory.
Second, "hardly to be shook off" doesn't need the understood words I mentioned. It can directly modify "hangs". How does the wife hang? Answer, "to be shook off hardly"
Third, I do not trust punctuation to acurately show syntax.
Finally, I think you could have diagrammed the independent clause at the top, which is the way it is usually done.
-
Re: Diagramming Shakespeare 14

Originally Posted by
Frank Antonson
Hier ist was ich denke daruber ---
First, I'm in school and they still have not been able to unblock the images,
You can unblock yourself. If you need instructions, whistle. 

Originally Posted by
Frank Antonson
so I am working from memory.
Second, "hardly to be shook off" doesn't need the understood words I mentioned. It can directly modify "hangs". How does the wife hang? Answer, "to be shook off hardly"
Third, I do not trust punctuation to acurately show syntax.
This part I see differently. Let us agree to disagree on this one. 

Originally Posted by
Frank Antonson
Finally, I think you could have diagrammed the independent clause at the top, which is the way it is usually done.
That I do not believe firmly.
-
Re: Diagramming Shakespeare 14
The advantage is that when you go to reconstruct the sentence you can do it quicker if you expect the independent clause to be at the top.
Also, as a rule, modifiers go under what they modify, and adjective and adverbial clauses are modifiers.
Noun clauses are another matter.
Similar Threads
-
By Frank Antonson in forum Analysing and Diagramming Sentences
Replies: 13
Last Post: 19-Jan-2010, 16:56
-
By Frank Antonson in forum Analysing and Diagramming Sentences
Replies: 6
Last Post: 13-Jan-2010, 11:27
-
By Frank Antonson in forum Analysing and Diagramming Sentences
Replies: 3
Last Post: 07-Jan-2010, 05:40
-
By Frank Antonson in forum Analysing and Diagramming Sentences
Replies: 6
Last Post: 22-Dec-2009, 14:40
-
By Frank Antonson in forum Analysing and Diagramming Sentences
Replies: 39
Last Post: 19-Dec-2009, 20:07
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1