27Likes -
two sentence analysis and tree structures
ok so i have a sentence
It was soon after leaving college that I finally bought an instrument of my own.
it = Subject
was = Predicator
and what's left is Subject Complement. or is there anything else?
the other sentence is
The case, which opens in the High Court on Thursday, has led to the discovery of 300 boxes of documents filling 110ft of shelving.
The case ... on Thursday = S
has led = P
to the discovery .... of shelving = Direct object
i'd like to clear this out first and then continue ...
-
Re: two sentence analysis and tree structures

Originally Posted by
thezelva
The case, which opens in the High Court on Thursday, has led to the discovery of 300 boxes of documents filling 110ft of shelving.
The case ... on Thursday = S
has led = P
to the discovery .... of shelving = Direct object
iI'd like to clear this out up first and then continue ...
I am not an analyser of sentences, but I can say that 'to the discovery .... of shelving' is not the direct object of anything. The only direct object in that sentence is '110 ft of shelving', the direct object of 'filling'
-
Re: two sentence analysis and tree structures
Oh no ... That's not good.
Do you have any idea what that could be then? Adverbial of some kind?
-
Re: two sentence analysis and tree structures

Originally Posted by
thezelva
ok so i have a sentence
It was soon after leaving college that I finally bought an instrument of my own.
it = Subject
was = Predicator
and what's left is Subject Complement. or is there anything else?
The main clause predicate is 'was...college', in which 'soon...college' - structurally a prepositional phrase - serves as an adverbial complement to 'was'. There then follows a further complemental element in the form of the subordinate clause 'that...own'.
-
Re: two sentence analysis and tree structures

Originally Posted by
thezelva
ok so i have a sentence
It was soon after leaving college that I finally bought an instrument of my own.
it = Subject
was = Predicator
and what's left is Subject Complement. or is there anything else?
the other sentence is
The case, which opens in the High Court on Thursday, has led to the discovery of 300 boxes of documents filling 110ft of shelving.
The case ... on Thursday = S
has led = P
to the discovery .... of shelving = Direct object
i'd like to clear this out first and then continue ...
(1) This is great fun. May I try? (My attempt at analysis is based on
our beloved Reed-Kellogg diagramming system.)
*****
(2) It = subject.
That I finally bought an instrument of my own. = noun clause in apposition with "it." (explains what "it" is.)
was = linking verb.
after leaving college. = prepositional phrase that serves as a subjective complement (refers to "it").
soon = prepositional phrase modifying the whole prepositional phrase.
*****
(3) The case = subject.
which opens in the High Court on Thursday. = adjective clause modifying "the case."
has led = verb.
to the discovery = prepositional phrase modifying "has led."
of 300 boxes = prepositional phrase modifying "discovery."
of documents = prepositional phrase modifying "boxes."
filling 110 feet = participial phrase modifying "documents."
of shelving = prepositional phrase modifying "feet."
-
Re: two sentence analysis and tree structures
A couple of minor quibbles:

Originally Posted by
TheParser
soon = prepositional phrase modifying the whole prepositional phrase.
??
'Soon' is an adverb, not a phrase of any kind... - a typo perhaps?
*****
(3) The case = subject.
to the discovery = prepositional phrase modifying "has led."
A complement rather than a modifier.
-
Re: two sentence analysis and tree structures

Originally Posted by
philo2009
A couple of minor quibbles:
(1) Yes, the "soon" matter was a typo. My mind was racing ahead to
"prepositional phrase" later on in the sentence. That's why proofreaders
are so important. I hear some newspapers are laying off proofreaders,
and this has led to more typos in some newspapers.
(2) has led (to the discovery). What is the difference between
"modifying" and "complementing"? I do not understand. Please
explain to me. Does it mean that "to the discovery" is essential to
the sentence? That it makes no sense to end a sentence with
"has led"?
Thank you for any guidance.
-
Re: two sentence analysis and tree structures

Originally Posted by
TheParser
Does it mean that "to the discovery" is essential to
the sentence? That it makes no sense to end a sentence with
"has led"?
Thank you for any guidance.
Precisely!
-
Re: two sentence analysis and tree structures

Originally Posted by
thezelva
ok so i have a sentence
It was soon after leaving college that I finally bought an instrument of my own.
it = Subject
was = Predicator
and what's left is Subject Complement. or is there anything else?
Well, let's see... This is what I think... The subject is indeed "it" and it has an appositive/noun clause that is "that I finally bought an instrument of my own" but don't forget that "of my own" is a prepositional phrase. The verb is "was" and "soon" is a predicate adjective. The part of the sentence left,"after leaving college" is a prepositional phrase and within the prepositional phrase is a gerund phrase "leaving college".
-
Re: two sentence analysis and tree structures
Here I have a sentence... Let's see how good you are
The great idea which pleased the tourist was to give the llamas bad anime so they would lose their minds.
Similar Threads
-
By panicmonger in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 3
Last Post: 26-Dec-2010, 07:12
-
By sash2008 in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 2
Last Post: 04-Nov-2008, 18:45
-
By Bmack in forum Analysing and Diagramming Sentences
Replies: 4
Last Post: 11-Mar-2008, 22:12
-
By ponder in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 1
Last Post: 06-Jul-2006, 14:55
-
By Anonymous in forum Ask a Teacher
Replies: 4
Last Post: 05-Feb-2004, 04:23
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules

Search Engine Optimization by
vBSEO 3.6.1