invasion of privacy vs. privacy invasion

William Yockey, 28, accuses the Seattle-based global coffee chain of invasion of privacy, negligence, "intentional infliction of emotional distress" and negligent hiring, training and supervision of staff.
(From http://au.news.yahoo.com/queensland/a/-/mp/10310141/tourist-sues-starbucks-over-hidden-camera/)

Would it be okay to say "privacy invasion" in place of invasion of privacy?

Greetings,

I am a high school pupil from Singapore.

Your question basically means whether 'privacy invasion' and 'invasion of privacy' are the same. My answer to you is: 'Yes, they are. Thus, they can be used interchangeably in any context'.

Cheerio,

Pham Duc Minh Anh

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by phamduc.minhanh

Your question basically means whether 'privacy invasion' and 'invasion of privacy' are the same. My answer to you is: 'Yes, they are. Thus they can be used interchangeably in any context'.

Source: high school pupil in Singapore.

---

Yes, they do mean the same thing, but they can't "be used interchangeably in any context." "Invasion of privacy" is a legal term; "privacy invasion" is not.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by riquecohen

Yes, they do mean the same thing, but they can't "be used interchangeably in any context." "Invasion of privacy" is a legal term; "privacy invasion" is not.

---

Greetings,

I am a high school pupil from Singapore.

Thank you very much for pointing this out.

Cheerio,

Pham Duc Minh Anh